<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/47b33fb8-13f7-11ec-bdd7-e0930aecb630?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/47b33fb8-13f7-11ec-bdd7-e0930aecb630</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-21T23:31:28</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-21T23:31:28</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Latest on the BCH versus BTC action</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/47b33fb8-13f7-11ec-bdd7-e0930aecb630</link>
<description><![CDATA[BTC HODLrs feel vindicated, but the long term prospects for BCH still seem strong. Ver is still correct about BCH being closer to the original vision, as flawed as that is.]]></description>
<author>teo</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/47b33fb8-13f7-11ec-bdd7-e0930aecb630</guid>
<pubDate>2017-11-14T08:54:10</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/47b33fb8-13f7-11ec-bdd7-e0930aecb630" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Latest on the BCH versus BTC action</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1510649650</link>
<description><![CDATA[BTC HODLrs feel vindicated, but the long term prospects for BCH still seem strong. Ver is still correct about BCH being closer to the original vision, as flawed as that is.]]></description>
<author>teo</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1510649650</guid>
<pubDate>2017-11-14T08:54:10</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1510649650" type="text/html" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
