<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/c322c019-13f9-11ec-bdd7-cadea5d78e23?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/c322c019-13f9-11ec-bdd7-cadea5d78e23</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-21T20:43:07</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-21T20:43:07</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Ed Harrison is seeing warning signs from the FED</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/c322c019-13f9-11ec-bdd7-cadea5d78e23</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
I think this is the Fed’s real conundrum this late in a business cycle. If the economy is running solidly and leading economic indicators are bullish, the Fed is hard-pressed to not raise rates in an environment in which headline unemployment is low and falling, asset prices are rich, and lending standards have loosened — even if the yield curve is flattening. Aren’t they supposed to take the punch bowl away?
<br /><br />
I don’t have the answer to that question. Time and again, late in the cycle, the Fed has indeed taken the punch bowl away. And the result was recession and financial crisis.
<br /><br />
That’s exactly why this is the most dangerous period in the business cycle
</blockquote>
...Or you could just END THE FED and not have to worry about this BS ever again.]]></description>
<author>teo</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/c322c019-13f9-11ec-bdd7-cadea5d78e23</guid>
<pubDate>2017-11-30T08:24:46</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/c322c019-13f9-11ec-bdd7-cadea5d78e23" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Ed Harrison is seeing warning signs from the FED</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1512030286</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
I think this is the Fed’s real conundrum this late in a business cycle. If the economy is running solidly and leading economic indicators are bullish, the Fed is hard-pressed to not raise rates in an environment in which headline unemployment is low and falling, asset prices are rich, and lending standards have loosened — even if the yield curve is flattening. Aren’t they supposed to take the punch bowl away?
<br /><br />
I don’t have the answer to that question. Time and again, late in the cycle, the Fed has indeed taken the punch bowl away. And the result was recession and financial crisis.
<br /><br />
That’s exactly why this is the most dangerous period in the business cycle
</blockquote>
...Or you could just END THE FED and not have to worry about this BS ever again.]]></description>
<author>teo</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1512030286</guid>
<pubDate>2017-11-30T08:24:46</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1512030286" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
