<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/e27f51b9-13f6-11ec-bdd7-969bb03bc30c?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/e27f51b9-13f6-11ec-bdd7-969bb03bc30c</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-21T01:28:07</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-21T01:28:07</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Yarvin&#x27;s back</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/e27f51b9-13f6-11ec-bdd7-969bb03bc30c</link>
<description><![CDATA[And in good form after the passing of his wife.  He makes a powerful case that "I just want to grill" is the reason monarchy happens.  We see this at every level of the economy (it's <em>why</em> full-time employment is a thing), and the idea of an ancap future is essentially this sort of corporate feudalism fully embraced.  This is the core dispute with the syndicalists, who insist not having worker ownership simply builds the oligarchy that installs oppression.  This seems to build a strong <em>systemic</em> case against dilution of ownership in a firm, much like with the old monarchies rejection of gavelkind in favor of winner-take-all inheritance.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/e27f51b9-13f6-11ec-bdd7-969bb03bc30c</guid>
<pubDate>2021-05-02T17:54:49</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/e27f51b9-13f6-11ec-bdd7-969bb03bc30c" type="text/html" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Yarvin&#x27;s back</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1619978089</link>
<description><![CDATA[And in good form after the passing of his wife.  He makes a powerful case that "I just want to grill" is the reason monarchy happens.  We see this at every level of the economy (it's <em>why</em> full-time employment is a thing), and the idea of an ancap future is essentially this sort of corporate feudalism fully embraced.  This is the core dispute with the syndicalists, who insist not having worker ownership simply builds the oligarchy that installs oppression.  This seems to build a strong <em>systemic</em> case against dilution of ownership in a firm, much like with the old monarchies rejection of gavelkind in favor of winner-take-all inheritance.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1619978089</guid>
<pubDate>2021-05-02T17:54:49</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1619978089" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
